2. The costs of the lawsuit, including the part resulting from the supplementary participation, are all assessed against the Plaintiff.

A. The Plaintiff is a corporation established for the purpose of promoting the sound development of C business in Seoul Special Metropolitan City and the friendship of its members holding a license for C business in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, employing approximately 300 full-time workers and running the business of educating its members.

The intervenor entered into an employment contract with the Plaintiff on March 17, 1986, and served as the Deputy Secretary General from June 1, 2015.

B. On November 4, 2015, the Plaintiff appointed D head of the general affairs division D as the 18th president, representative, and chief secretary of the headquarters election (hereinafter “18th simultaneous elections”) as the main secretary of the election commission at the headquarters election commission at the headquarters of the 18th presidential affairs. The Intervenor appointed the Intervenor as an assistant secretary of the election commission at the headquarters of the 18th simultaneous elections.

C. On July 22, 2016, the Plaintiff notified the intervenors on July 2, 2016 that the Disciplinary Committee will be held as of July 29, 2016 regarding “violations of Article 27 of the Personnel and Service Regulations of the Intervenors related to the 18 simultaneous elections and re-elections.”

The Plaintiff’s personnel committee held on July 29, 2016, August 1, 2016, and August 2, 2016 decided that the Intervenor shall be punished by the grounds for disciplinary action specified in attached Table 1, and the chairperson of the personnel committee notified the Intervenor on August 2, 2016.

(hereinafter “instant dismissal”) e.

On August 4, 2016, an intervenor filed a petition for review with the Plaintiff.

However, the personnel committee of the plaintiff, which was held on August 11, 2016, dismissed the plaintiff's request for a retrial, and the plaintiff notified the intervenor on August 16, 2016.

F. On October 14, 2016, the Intervenor asserted that the instant dismissal constituted unfair dismissal and applied for remedy for unfair dismissal to the Seoul Regional Labor Relations Commission.

The Seoul Regional Labor Relations Commission(Seoul Regional Labor Relations Commission) on January 19, 2017 refers to attached Table 1 Disciplinary Grounds (1), (2) Disciplinary Grounds (2) 1 Disciplinary Grounds (hereinafter referred to as "Disciplinary Grounds").

(3) The grounds for the second disciplinary action are 'the grounds for the second disciplinary action'.

(4) The third ground for the disciplinary action shall be referred to as "the third ground for the disciplinary action".

(5) The grounds for the disciplinary action under paragraph (1) are not recognized.