2. The judgment of the court below is contrary to the defendant's mistake when the defendant was in the trial, and even though the defendant was found to have agreed with the victim of the crime of injury, the defendant committed the crime of this case. The crime of this case was committed by drinking and drinking the taxi article 67 years old without any particular reason, and was committed by drinking the police officer's bath and chest after he was arrested in the crime of this case. The nature and criminal situation are very heavy. The defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of 2 years in 2010 and it was confirmed at that time. The defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of 2 years in 20 years in 2010 and was sentenced to a punishment for a crime of obstructing the performance of official duties again after the period of the suspended sentence was more than once, the defendant was sentenced to a fine to a punishment for a crime of obstructing the performance of official duties of this case, again, the defendant's punishment for the crime of this case is not required to be established in consideration of the age of the defendant's public authority, and there is no need to punish various legal order.

3. The appeal by the defendant is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal by the defendant is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.