At around 11:00 on April 16, 200, the Defendant stated that “The Defendant would sell gold to the victim E (the name after the opening of the 45-year old name: F) and then receive KRW 200 million on a check from the victim E (the Defendant would sell gold at the market price until October 16, 2009 and offer profits by selling the gold at the price of KRW 70,000,000.”

However, in fact, since the Defendant had a large amount of personal debt at the time, and it is difficult to conduct business due to the lack of good gold-related games, even if receiving KRW 200 million from the victim's test, the Defendant did not have the ability to normally sell the accident and return it to the victim, and such money received was considered to be consumed by both the Defendant's repayment of personal debt, entertainment tavern use fee, gambling fund, etc.

Ultimately, the Defendant, as above, obtained 200 million won from the victim by deceiving the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Grounds for sentencing under Article 347(1) of the Criminal Act for the relevant criminal facts: The confession or the punishment heavier than suspended sentence is nonexistent. The reason for aggravation is that the victim runs away and is arrested. No effort to recover loss is made.