However, the execution of punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On May 10, 2018, the Defendant: (a) around 21:55, the subway 1, which had been drinking in front of 27:3 times in front of the front line of the front line of the Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (e.g., this refers to the following: (b) the Defendant: (c) the Defendant took a 112 report by a witness; and (d) was urged by the police officer in charge of the prevention and maintenance of order of the crime to return home from C, who had been dispatched to the scene after receiving the report by the witness’s name unscambling person; and (c) the Defendant took a bath to “Ye, ...........” on his hand, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of duties of the police officer in relation to the prevention and maintenance of crime by assaulting the c by force by scambling his hand.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made with respect to C and D;

1. A E-document;

1. Investigation reports (verification of an on-site recording file);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing the processing of standing photographs, audio-recording files, and reported cases under 112;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Grounds for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Type 1 (Interference with the performance of public duties and coercion of duties) area (six months to one year) of the basic area (one year from one year and six months) of the recommended punishment according to the sentencing criteria; and

2. The Criminal Procedure Act provides a 112 report due to the disturbance caused by the Defendant’s decision on the sentence and takes a bath to police officers called out, and the crime that uses violence is not easy in light of the degree of the use of violence, etc.

On the other hand, the defendant seems to recognize and reflect the crime, and there is no record of criminal punishment as well as criminal punishment of a fine on one occasion in 2013.

In addition, the sentencing conditions specified in the records and arguments, such as the defendant's age, occupation, sex, family relationship, circumstances before and after the crime, etc., shall be determined as the order.