A shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won, and a fine of 150,000 won, respectively.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

1. On December 2, 2012, Defendant A: (a) around 23:20 on December 2, 2012, the Defendant inflicted injury on the victim B (year 66) and the victim’s face and head in front of the “E” restaurant located in Seogu-gu, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu; (b) in consideration of the problem of the victim B (year 66) and the taxi rate, the victim was in need of two weeks of treatment.

2. Defendant B, at the above date, and at the above place, assaulted the victim A(25 years of age) with her fingers, her ears, and ears, on the ground of the foregoing reasons.

Summary of Evidence

[Defendant A]

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Partial statement of the witness F in the court;

1. Partial statement of the witness B;

1. A medical certificate prepared by the G doctor with respect to B;

1. The video recorded in the CD (Investigative Records 49 pages), 'Foreign Exchange Bankctv.avi,' and 'Woos Smartphone.MPG' [Defendant B]

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Partial statement of the witness F in the court;

1. Investigation report (Investigation of the counter party of the shootings);

1. Application of the Act and subordinate statutes of the foreign exchange banks,ctv.avi, and Madon Smartphone.MG, stored in the CD (Investigative Records 49 pages)

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) (Selection of Fine) of the Criminal Act: Defendant B: Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act (Selection of Fine);

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

1. Defendant A: The main sentence of Article 186(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act and Article 191(1) of the Act on Criminal Procedure B: The portion not guilty under the proviso to Article 186(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. Of the facts charged against Defendant B’s assault, we examine the part of the facts charged that Defendant A’s “satisfebbage, satfebage, satfe, and sated and pushed down.”

2. As to the issue of whether the Defendant gets off and pushed off the A’s lusium, we examine the pertinent part (00:28) of the video recorded by F (i.e., wooden cellphone.MPG stored in the investigation record 49 pages). It is rather than because the physical cause of the Defendant’s beyond A’s lusium was smuggling.