When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

1. On October 11, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around 00:45, the Defendant: (b) stated that the Victim B was boarding the C-si operated by the victim B in front of the Busan, Daegu, Daegu, Daegu, the Busan, and (c) went to a low-value telecom. On the same day, around 00:50 on the same day, the Defendant set the E-si in front of Busan, which is located in the Busan, Daegu, the Busan, and there is a brying to go so that there is no low-priced telecom.

The portion of “the victim” referred to as “the victim laid off the NA installed in the taxi in his/her hand, thereby impairing the utility of the property.

2. The Defendant expressed the victim’s desire to bring the instant action from a taxi, which was called “sweak,” and assaulted the victim, such as the victim’s wheels with the victim’s face to write the victim’s knife and fall off on the floor, and the rear wheeler.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Application of the police statement protocol law to B

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act and Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of violence and the choice of fines) concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;