A Imprisonment with prison labor of one year and six months, and Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor of ten months.

except that from the date of this judgment.

Defendant

A is a person who has worked as an attorney-at-law office office, etc., and Defendant B is an owner of 1,133 square meters in Guri-si.

Defendant

B On January 9, 2007, in order to set up a right to collateral security with the debtor as the defendant himself/herself and as the person liable for registration in lieu of the certificate of registration, on the document confirming that the person liable for registration is the person liable for registration, and on this basis, on the 24th of the same month, the registration of the establishment of the right to collateral security with the above content on the above land was completed.

Defendant

B After that, when H, a mortgagee, exercised the right to collateral security on the ground of the non-performance of his/her obligation, and the auction of the said land was conducted through the auction of the International District Court I real estate trust, he/she sought the method from Defendant A in order to prevent the sale of the said land, the price of which has already been high, and to find the method, the Defendants received a copy of the application for the registration of the establishment of the right to collateral security and related documents from the Jung-gu District Court around the end of December 2012.

1. On January 2013, Defendant A filed a lawsuit claiming the cancellation of the registration of establishment of a neighboring apartment at the Defendant’s house located in Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government J apartment 705 Dong 503, and filed an application for the suspension of compulsory execution of the above real estate auction case, Defendant A filed a lawsuit against H on the part of the Defendant’s house located in Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Office, and filed a motion for the suspension of compulsory execution of the above real estate auction case, Defendant A sent B’s unmanned seal marked in the name of attorney G as a emulmat and copied two copies from the door room located in the jurisdiction of Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Office, Gangdong-gu Office, and returned to the Defendant’s house and returned to the Defendant’s house, and then copied the confirmation document affixed by the emulsor of the deceased’s emuls at the location near the Seoul Dong District Prosecutors’ Office.

Accordingly, the defendant is entitled to exercise the certification of facts in the name of Attorney G, which is a private document.