1. According to the records of the accused case, the accused and the applicant for medical treatment and custody (hereinafter “defendant”) appealed against the judgment of the first instance, and asserted only unfair sentencing as the grounds for appeal.

In such a case, the argument that the lower court erred by violating the law and the fairness of the trial cannot be a legitimate ground for appeal.

2. On the grounds indicated in its reasoning, the lower court upheld the first instance judgment ordering a criminal defendant to receive medical treatment and custody at a medical treatment and custody facility and to have the risk of recidivism.

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the relevant legal principles and records, the lower court did not err in its judgment as alleged in the grounds of appeal.

3. Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.