도로법위반
The defendant shall be innocent.
1. Around June 28, 2001, around 02:15, the Defendant violated the restrictions on vehicle operation of the road management agency by operating the freight loaded at the 13.4t, 5 axis 16.6t of the B freight vehicle owned by the Defendant in excess of 10t of the limitation on the load weight of the B freight vehicle owned by the Defendant in relation to the Defendant’s business at the 64 km point.
2. In the Constitutional Court Decision 2010Hun-Ga14, 15, 21, 27, 35, 38, 44, 70 (merger) rendered on October 28, 2010, the Constitutional Court rendered a decision of unconstitutionality on the portion that "if an agent, employee, or other worker of a corporation commits a violation under Article 83 (1) 2 in connection with the business of the corporation, and the part that Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4920 of Jan. 5, 1995, and amended by Act No. 7832 of Dec. 30, 2005) applied to the facts charged in this case by the public prosecutor, the Constitutional Court ruled that "if the agent, employee, or other worker of the corporation commits a violation under Article 83 (1) 2 in connection with the business of the corporation, the corporation shall also be punished by a fine under the relevant Article."
3. According to the conclusion, the facts charged in this case constitute a crime, and thus, is acquitted pursuant to the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.