2. The judgment of the defendant shows the attitude of reflecting the defendant's wrongness, and the fact that the defendant agreed with the victim is favorable to the defendant.

On the other hand, the crime of this case, when the vehicle of the defendant was towed by the control of parking, the defendant parked the vehicle of the defendant at the entrance of the towing engine where the above vehicle was in custody, and went away from the above place for a considerable time, and obstructed the business of towing the towing of the towing engine by interfering with the passage of the vehicle of the towing engine. Considering the details of the crime, the circumstances of the crime, the time and degree of interference with the operation, etc., the crime of this case does not seem to be less severe, and the defendant has a number of criminal punishment records, including criminal records and criminal records, against the defendant.

Considering the above circumstances favorable or unfavorable to the defendant, and the age, sex, environment, and all other conditions of sentencing as shown in the argument of this case, the sentence imposed by the court below is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.