beta
(영문) 부산지방법원 2013.07.18 2013노1017

게임산업진흥에관한법률위반

Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The sentencing of the court below (two months of imprisonment, confiscation) is too unreasonable.

2. In light of the following circumstances, the court below’s sentencing is reasonable in light of the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant’s act of speculative game room, operated by the Defendant, put the general public into the suspicion of fluoring of game and fluoral income; (b) causing home blasting and reducing his desire to work; (c) the Defendant has been punished several times due to other criminal facts; and (d) the motive and circumstances leading up to the instant crime; (d) the Defendant’s motive and circumstances after the instant crime; (e) the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, and environment; and (e) various other circumstances on which the sentencing conditions specified in the instant records and arguments are attached.

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed under Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.