아동ㆍ청소년의성보호에관한법률위반(알선영업행위등)등
Defendant
A and D Imprisonment with prison labor for four years, each of the defendants B, C, E, and F shall be punished by imprisonment for three years and six months.
Defendant
A. D.
Punishment of the crime
"2016 Gohap 385"
1. Defendant A and C’s Nrelated Child’s Violation of the Act on the Protection of Juveniles against Sexual Abuse (Coercive Conduct, etc.) and the Act on the Protection of Children’s Juveniles against Sexual Abuse (Good Offices, etc.) shall exercise overall control over the management of sexual traffic prices. Defendant C was willing to engage in sexual traffic by soliciting male sexual traffic through mobile phone display cases.
A. On May 2016, Defendant C continuously proposed to N (V, 14 years of age) that “I will be 300 times a month, which is likely to reduce 14 years of age, and is very bad,” and Defendant C would only offer “P” coffee shop located in Ulsannam-guO in the police officer in June 2016, and Defendant A would reduce the level of KRW 4 million per month.
I will be free from doing the horse operation to Adozzers and Moelel.
Sexual relations may be established and may not be established.
“.....”
As a result, Defendants conspired to attract and induce to become the counterpart of the act of buying sex of juveniles for business purposes.
B. The Defendants recommended N to engage in sexual traffic as indicated in the above paragraph (a) and allowed them to engage in sexual traffic. From Jun. 2, 2016 to Jun. 2016, the building Q203 in Ulsan-gu Q from Jun. 2, 2016 to Jun. 1, 2016, the Defendants connected to mobile phone-based telephone cing onto “R” and “S” to post a letter as if they were sexual traffic women, and send N to the hospital or its neighboring convenience stores if their sexual purchases contact with each other.
At least 10,000 won from the south of sex purchase and arrange to engage in sexual traffic over about 45 times a day average, two times a day, and paid KRW 2,50,000 to N in one month.
As a result, Defendants conspired to act as a broker in buying sex of juveniles and act as a business of providing intermediary information in information and communication network.
2. The relation between Defendant A’s violation of the Act on the Protection of Children’s Juveniles against Sexual Abuse (Coercive Conduct, etc.), Defendant A, C, and B.