강제추행
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) that the court below rendered is too unreasonable. (The punishment of imprisonment with prison labor for six months, two years suspended sentence, 40 hours required to attend a lecture for treatment of sexual assault, and 200 hours for community service work) is too unreasonable.
2. Determination is more advantageous to the fact that the defendant recognized the crime of late late and reflected by the defendant, that the injured person prepared the agreement at the investigation stage, that is, the aged and health is not good, and that there is no criminal record for the same kind of crime.
However, in full view of the following circumstances: (a) the victim appears to have suffered a considerable sense of sexual humiliation and fladation due to the instant crime; (b) the Defendant continued to deny the instant crime until the lower court rendered the lower judgment; and (c) the victim had suffered from the pain to make a statement of the damaged fact by leaving a numerical memory in the court; (d) equity in sentencing with similar cases; and (e) equity in sentencing with the Defendant’s age, sex behavior, environment, family relationship, and circumstances after the instant crime, etc., it is difficult to deem that the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable as it is too unreasonable.
Therefore, we do not accept the above argument of the defendant's above sentencing.
3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.