When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On November 16, 2014, the Defendant, upon receiving a report from 112, sent to the site the disturbance of the D Building 402 of Daegu Suwon-gu D Building No. 03:50 on November 16, 2014, the Defendant: (a) took a bath that F, who was sent to the site, would be able to see, “I see, you will see, you will see, you will do so”; (b) f, who f, f, who f, who was sent to the site, f, who was f, who was f, who was f, at the time of drinking.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the police statement-related Acts and subordinate statutes to F;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order include not only the defendant's mistake in depth, but also the degree of assault and obstruction of official duties is insignificant, and F is the defendant's preference. The first offender is the defendant's age, character and conduct, intelligence and environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and various reasons for sentencing as shown in the arguments, such as circumstances after the crime, are considered.