For the reasons indicated in its reasoning, the lower court reversed the first instance judgment that found the Defendant guilty on the ground that there was no proof of a crime, and sentenced the Defendant not guilty.

In light of the record, the lower court did not err in its judgment by misapprehending the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules or by misapprehending the legal principles on the principle of direct deliberation, the recognition of reduced facts, and changes in indictment, contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal.

On the other hand, the prosecutor appealed the entire judgment of the court below, but there is no evidence of objection to the remainder of the grounds of appeal.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.