손해배상(자)
1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part of the judgment against the Defendants exceeding the money ordered to be paid below is revoked.
1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as follows, except for the modification of the pertinent part of the judgment of the court of first instance as set forth in paragraph (2) below, and therefore, it is consistent with the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, it is cited by the main text of Article 420 of
2. To delete the portion to be corrected from 5th to 6th of the judgment of the first instance court and to 5th of the fifth to 6th of the judgment as follows:
“B) At the time of the instant accident, the Deceased’s management of the truck transport business (O) in the name of Plaintiff A: (a) the Deceased was operating the cargo vehicle and operated the cargo vehicle; (b) the Educational Service was engaged in the educational service as an individual entrepreneur; (c) the income was engaged in N’s activities as N’s insurance solicitors; (d) the income as a truck driver was 2,937,462 won per month on the basis of the annual average wage rate of the cargo driver under the income in 2017 and the report on the survey of construction wages; (e) the amount was 13,521 x 22 days per month on the basis of the annual average wage rate of the cargo driver on the report; (e) the amount was 504,325 won per month [200 won per annum 45,720,68,68,100 per year - annual average income per annum 1/12]; and (e) the amount was 2016,16316 won per year or per year average income amount of the deceased’s.