beta
(영문) 창원지방법원 통영지원 2018.09.13 2017가합10462

보험에관한 소송

Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On August 27, 2007, the Plaintiff entered into an insurance contract with the Defendant listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant insurance contract”).

B. The insurance contracts, including the instant insurance contracts, concluded by the Defendant with the policyholder or the insured are as listed in the following table:

On January 8, 2015, 200 won, 60,400 won, 36,100 won, 42,300 won, 44,00 won, 5,00 won, 5,00 won, 35,00 won, 77,275 won, 7,275 won, 200 won, 30,000 won, 20,000 won, 12,30,00 won, 44,00 won, 20,000 won, 35,05,00 won, 35,050 won, 30,000 won, 20,000 won, 10,000 won, 10,10,000 won, 10,000 won, 106,000 won, 10,000 won, 208,7,000 won, 201.

C. Based on each insurance contract from October 1, 2008 to February 4, 2017, the Defendant received KRW 16,467,093 in total from the Plaintiff, KRW 7,880,00 in total from Korea Post, KRW 16,730,00 in total from school life insurance, KRW 16,620,00 in total from NHF damage insurance, and KRW 284,90 in lot, respectively.

[Grounds for Recognition] Uncontentious Facts, Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 2, and each of the response to financial transaction information to the Korea Credit Information Institute of this Court, and the Korea Postal Information Center, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The main point of the Plaintiff’s assertion was that the Defendant received false hospitalized treatment beyond a reasonable level for the excessive receipt of insurance proceeds, and in addition, the number of days of hospitalization similar to that of multiple insurance companies.