When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The defendant is a person engaged in agriculture.

The Defendant, as a member of the agricultural cooperative B, is an elector in the election of the head of the cooperative head at the first time nationwide, which was implemented on March 11, 2015.

For the purpose of preventing an election, the candidate shall not publish false facts about the candidate's spouse, lineal ascendants or descendants, or siblings disadvantageous to the candidate by means of the election campaign bulletin or other means, and no one shall carry out an election campaign in any way except where the candidate conducts an election campaign pursuant to the provisions of the candidate.

피고인은 2015. 2. 26. 16:44경 C에 있는 피고인 소유 밭에서 피고인의 휴대전화(D)로 위 조합의 조합원이며 선거인인 E에게 전화를 걸어 “너는 누굴 찍을 거냐”라고 말문을 연 다음 “이번에 곧은 사람(조합장 당선자 F을 칭함)을 찍자. 조합장(낙선자인 당시 조합장 G을 칭함)이 제주시에 땅도 사고 집도 샀다고 하더라. 지금 H에 근무하는 조카(E의 조카를 칭함)가 줄을 잘못 서면 아오지 탄광에 보내질 것이다. F의 각시 (처)가 꽝 (뼈)와 거죽 (가죽) 밖에 없더라, 우리가 도와야 할 것 아니냐.“라고 말하였다.

However, the above G does not own real estate at Jeju.

As a result, the Defendant published false facts about the property status of G in a way unfavorable to the above G with a view to preventing the above G from being elected, and carried out an election campaign for the said F.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A complaint filed by G;

1. Application of each statute on police statements to I, E, G, J, F, and K;

1. Article 61 (2) of the Act on Entrusted Elections by Public Organizations, Etc. and subparagraph 1 of Article 66 and Article 24 (1) of the Act on Entrusted Elections by Public Organizations, Etc. shall apply to an election campaign conducted by a person who is not a candidate under Article 61 (1) of the Act on Entrusted Elections;