except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of a Class C and III cargo vehicle.

On October 27, 2014, the Defendant driven a vehicle above the age of 15:45 and got the victim into the ground by neglecting the duty of front-way care while driving the road in front of the Jak Village in the new village room in the new village room, and by neglecting the duty of front-way care at the new village room in the new village room in the new village, and by neglecting the steering direction and brake system properly, the Defendant got the body of the victim D (n, 63 years old) walking on the right side from the left side in the front section of the Defendant's vehicle.

Ultimately, due to the above occupational negligence, the Defendant caused the death of the victim due to the external shock shock from the workplace.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. A written statement;

1. A corpse of corpse;

1. Application of the photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents in the Selection of Punishment, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and selection of

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution (i.e., a white and reflective point, a smooth agreement between the victim and his/her bereaved family members, and a primary offender, taking into account the circumstances favorable to the defendant);