beta
(영문) 대구지방법원 김천지원 2016.12.20 2016고정596

협박

Text

Defendants are not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the Defendants is publicly announced.

Reasons

1. Facts charged;

A. Defendant A is a person who has invested money in the family-friendly interest of her husband C (n, 37 years of age) and D with a high school-friendly interest of her husband D.

Around May 13, 2015, the Defendant was asked the victim of the said D’s whereabouts to the victim before the office of the Sejong Sinsi, Inc., Ltd. located in the Gumi-si, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, on the phone (e.g., whether there is any situation at present, sofinus, and if you come to the distance, finite, finer, and finer at home, finch finch finch finch, sofinch finch finch, and finch finch finch, before the association or flag, after having been assigned to the father of the finch and was assigned to the father of the finch, and then, “if you want to take care of the victim and the victim to take care of the victim, I would soon contact the victim and the victim if you want to do so.”

B. Defendant B is a person who has invested money in D high school-friendly interest of the husband of the victim C (AW, 37 years of age) and D.

While the Defendant was holding the victim’s whereabouts on May 15, 2015, the Defendant threatened the victim with “A few other Cities of B”, “A son’s A son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son,” and “A son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son

2. In the crime of intimidation, the term "Intimidation" means, as a general rule, the notification of harm to the extent that it may cause fear to a person. Thus, an intentional act as a subjective element of the crime is a threat of harm to such an extent.