However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant, via B around January 2016, through the victim C, had land in the former Eup/Myeon, which would soon be developed.

many money can be sold.

However, there are several legal problems, and there are some money in arranging them.

The subsidy will be granted to the main interest of the cost.

“.....”

However, the Defendant did not have the land in the previous Eup/Myeon, and the Defendant was holding the land in the previous Eup/Myeon, but the Defendant did not have any right to the land. The Defendant, at the time, was willing to use the money received from the injured party for the repayment of the said obligation because he did not have any intent or ability to repay the money, even if he borrowed the money from the injured party.

On January 11, 2016, the Defendant stated “10,000 won” and “151,150,000 won” as “16,150,000 won” as “16,150,000 won” as “160,150,000 won” as “10,000 won” as “10,000,000 won” as “10,000,000 won” as “10,000,000 won” as “10,000,000,000 won” as “in the case of the crime in which the Defendant acquired the money,” and “10,00,000,000 won” as “10,000,000 won” as “in the case of the crime in which the Defendant’s indictment was attached, and the court changed the Defendant’s oral consent as “15,01,000 won” as “15,500,000 won” respectively.

Therefore, the phrase “10,00,000 won” in the column for the fraud amount of No. 25 of the attached crime list shall be changed to “10,000,000 won”, and the phrase “151,150,000 won” in the total column shall be changed to “160,150,000 won”, respectively.

As described above, the sum of KRW 160,150,00 was transferred to the Agricultural Cooperative Account in the name of the defendant, the Saemaul Treasury Account in the name of the defendant, and the account in the name of E.