2. The defendant's attitude of recognizing and opposing the judgment is recognized, and the defendant has no other criminal records other than the fine imposed twice for traffic-related crimes. However, considering the fact that the defendant used a positive deception method by deceiving money under the name of employment solicitation, the content of deception is prejudicial to the social trust in the employment market, the amount of defraudation of the crime of this case reaches KRW 36 million, and there is no specific recovery from damage, the crime of this case is not easy and there is no possibility of criticism. In light of the above circumstances and other circumstances, even if considering the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, motive and circumstance of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, etc., the punishment of the court below is heavy.

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed under Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act.