손해배상(의)
1. The part against the plaintiff in the judgment of the first instance, including the plaintiff's claim extended and added in the trial.
1. Basic facts
A. The parties concerned are dentists who operate H dental clinic located in Daegu Seo-gu G (hereinafter “instant hospital”); Defendant F is a dentist employed by Defendant E and worked at the instant hospital; and the Plaintiff is a patient who underwent dental treatment at the instant hospital.
B. On December 22, 2009, the Plaintiff, at the instant hospital, was undergoing the procedure of cutting down the 3 Daegu on the right side of Haak (hereinafter referred to as “voluntary treatment”) from Defendant F (hereinafter referred to as “the instant procedure”). The Plaintiff’s voluntary treatment did not cover the bones on the bones, thereby cutting down the part covered only in gring.
C. On December 23, 2009, the day after the instant medical procedure, the Plaintiff asserted that the instant hospital had a sense of anesthesia less than anesthesia, and on December 26, 2009, the Plaintiff visited the instant hospital and was subject to disinfection on the part of the Plaintiff, because grasium was less anesthesia, and the Plaintiff visited the instant hospital twice more and received prescription and disinfection treatment, and on January 19, 2010, the Plaintiff still fell under the sense of misunderstanding on the part of the instant hospital, Defendant F returned to the largest case, so it is difficult for 3 months first.”
3) On August 27, 2010, the Plaintiff applied to the G Hospital I of the Daejeon University. On March 22, 2012, the J professor in charge instructed the Plaintiff to undergo observations six months after the completion of the period, stating that “The end part of the term was a 1/3 fluence of the central 1/3 fluence, but is not a fluence, but has no sense of sense, and it is expected that the recovery would lead to an adequate stimulation, and that the recovery would take two to five years.” (iv) On March 22, 2012, the Plaintiff was provided with drugs after the medical treatment for at least the sense of gluence in the anesthesia of the anesthesia Hospital of the Daegu University University.
5. On June 25, 2012, the Plaintiff visited the instant hospital.