2. The total policies and incentives of the organization of single-sing crimes in the market are in China and abroad, and thus it is difficult to arrest the organization. Only if it is necessary to refrain from participating in the crime by placing the collection and face-to-face books that are essential for the completion of the crime, it can eradicate the crimes of single-sing, i.e., taking advantage of the collection and face-to-face books.

The Defendant recognized all of the crimes of this case, but the Defendant was aware that it was used as a presidential passbook in an unlawful crime, such as singinging, etc., and the Defendant received 50,000 won per page of the presidential passbook, which is essential for the completion of singishing crime, and kept 50,00 won per page 9 on five occasions, and the nature of the crime is bad, and taking into account other circumstances, such as the Defendant’s age, sex, criminal records, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, etc., which are conditions for sentencing as shown in the records and arguments of this case, the lower court’s punishment is too too unreasonable, and thus, the Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.