A Imprisonment with prison labor for two years, and for ten months, for each of the defendants B.

However, this judgment is delivered against Defendant B.

Defendant

A on May 2, 2013, at the Seoul Central District Court, sentenced ten months to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc. ( natives) in the same year.

9. 29. The execution of the above punishment was completed.

The Defendants, who are not all authorized to handle psychotropic drugs, dealt with the following philophones and marijuana, even though they cannot handle psychotropic drugs with Mesophopopopon (hereinafter referred to as 'philoopon', hereinafter).

1. Defendant A

A. Around May 30, 2014, the Defendant, holding a philophone, kept approximately 0.1g of philophones in a single philosophical E office located in Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Gangdong-gu (Evidence 2).

Accordingly, the Defendant possessed a psychotropicly-psychotropicly-psychotropic drugs.

B. On September 2014, the Defendant: (a) purchased philophones and marijuana from his name-free persons through Internet hosting in the cross-sponsic sponsed spons in Seoul Jung-gu, Seoul; (b) placed 200,000 won in cash under the upper sponsing air telephone boxes, which are the place of advance promise; and (c) purchased approximately 0.3 grams and marijuana 0.5g of philophonespphones, which were kept in cash by the winners of the name after locking 20,000 won; and (d) purchased 0.3g and 0.5g of marijuana.

Accordingly, the Defendant traded philophones and marijuana at once.

C. On September 2014, the Defendant administered approximately 0.05g of philophones purchased from Gmophones located in the Seoul Special Metropolitan City Gwangjin-gu, by dilution them into a non-saminian beverage. 2) The Defendant, around October 11, 2014, administered them in a manner of drinking around 0.05g of philophones purchased from Gmophones.

Pursuant to the paragraph, approximately 0.05g of philophones purchased have been administered in a manner of drinking by dilution with non-pact drinks.

Accordingly, the Defendant administered psychotropic drugs in two times, respectively. D.

The Defendant for smoking marijuana

(c) at the same time and place as paragraph 2, after deducting the contents of general tobacco from them;