근로기준법위반
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant is the representative of C in Nam-si, Namyang-si, who ordinarily employs five workers and operates the manufacturing industry.
The Defendant shall have served from July 22, 2013 to October 10, 2013 in the foregoing workplace.
Labor D’s 1,200,00 won in September 2013, and 460,660,000 won in October of the same year, and E’s 600,000 won in October 14, 2008 to November 23, 2013, which were employed from April 14, 2008 to November 23, 2013, did not pay 2,40,000 won in total as wages of November 1, 204 in the same year within 14 days from each retirement date without any agreement between the parties on extension of payment date.
2. The judgment is the case in which a public prosecution cannot be instituted against the victim's explicit intent pursuant to Article 109 (2) of the Labor Standards Act. According to the records, it is recognized that the above workers have withdrawn their wish to punish the defendant after the prosecution of this case. Thus, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 (6) of the Criminal Procedure Act.