교통사고처리특례법위반
The judgment of the court below is reversed.
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
1. The decision of the court below on the summary of the grounds for appeal (the two-year suspended execution in June of the safe and the forty-hour order to attend a course) is too unreasonable.
2. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case is a person engaging in driving a B M& car.
On January 29, 2014, the Defendant driven the above car at around 17:30 on January 29, 2014, and moved to the direction of the Suwon Heavy Police Station in the area of the Suwon Heavy Police Station in order to stop temporarily in the direction of the Suwon Heavy Police Station in order to stop immediately before the crosswalk, but the pedestrian signal, etc. in the crosswalk continued to move to red signal in green signals.
In this case, a person engaged in driving service of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to take full account of road conditions, such as whether there is a pedestrian on the crosswalk, and to accurately manipulate the steering direction and brake system of the motor vehicle.
그럼에도 불구하고 피고인은 이를 게을리 한 채 주변 상황을 제대로 살피지 않아 마침 횡단보도를 위 승용차의 왼쪽에서 오른쪽으로 건너고 있던 피해자 C(15세)를 발견하지 못하고 만연히 차량을 출발시켜 횡단보도에 진입한 과실로 위 승용차의 앞범퍼 부분으로 피해자의 오른쪽 허벅지 부분을 들이받고, 계속하여 제동하는 대신 가속페달을 밟아 피해자의 왼쪽 발 부분이 피고인의 운전 차량 앞 바퀴와 화단 경계석 사이에 끼이게 하여 피해자로 하여금 약 16주간의 치료를 요하는 좌측 발의 으깸 손상(족지 불구) 등의 상해를 입게 하였다.
3. Judgment on the grounds for appeal by the defendant ex officio shall be examined ex officio.
The facts charged in this case are those falling under Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and Article 268 of the Criminal Act, which cannot be punished against the express will of the victim under Article 3(2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of
According to the records, the victim is the victim of this case.