If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Around August 10, 2012, the Defendant made a false statement that “The Defendant would have paid 30 or more installments to others, so he would have paid 5 days thereafter, because he had paid 30 or more installments to others.”

However, at the time, the defendant was liable for 15 million won to the victim, and he was paid 110,000 won each day by the day, and there was no intention or ability to repay even if he borrowed money with no particular income or property.

The defendant deceivings the victim as above, and thereby, KRW 900,000 on the same day from the victim; and

9. Around May 1, 200, KRW 4 million, KRW 1.2 million around 17th of the same month, and KRW 1.3 million around 26 October 26 of the same year were provided four times, including KRW 1.4 million.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement D in the suspect examination protocol of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Relevant Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.