A Imprisonment with labor for one year, 10 months, 3,00,000 won, and 2.

Defendant

A is a de facto representative of a stock company B (hereinafter referred to as “State B”) that wholesale and retails lub oil, etc.; Defendant C is a management director of a stock company that manufactures lub oil, etc. (hereinafter referred to as “StateG”) and a management director of a stock company that manufactures lub oil, etc. (hereinafter referred to as “H”) with the said company; H is a de facto representative; Defendant D is a person who manufactures lub oil, etc. and is in charge of the management of the J stock company (hereinafter referred to as “J”) that is the de facto representative; Defendant C is a company established for the purpose of manufacturing and selling lub oil, etc.; Defendant C is a company that manufactures and sells lub oil, etc. to obtain loans from financial institutions; Defendant C is to purchase lub oil, etc. with the actual results of trading, etc., intending to disguise the purchase and sale performance of lub oil, etc., and to obtain an additional tax invoice to the extent that it does not obtain a false tax invoice from the said company (hereinafter referred to as Defendant CK).

[2] A false sales tax invoice in the name of the Defendant is identified with the company subject to issuance of false purchase tax invoices via the management director L, while a false sales tax invoice in the name of the Plaintiff was delivered to the Defendant A. (State)

1. No tax invoice under the Value-Added Tax Act shall be issued or issued without supplying or being supplied with the goods or services of the defendant A and the defendant C;