However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant is the representative director of Dong (former E) Co., Ltd. located in Yeonsu-gu Incheon Building C.

On October 12, 2018, the Defendant did not appear without justifiable grounds despite being served a summons issued under the name of the chairperson of the National Assembly Education Committee to attend the second floor of the Gyeongnam-do Office of Education at the 2nd floor of the 241 Gyeongnam-do Office of Education as a witness on October 19, 2018 in order to examine the “verification of the controversy over the re-agreement regarding the development fund for school convenience support” of the National Assembly Education Committee of the National Assembly Education Committee on October 19, 2018.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Examination protocol of the accused by prosecution;

1. A written accusation, a written accusation, text message, a medical examination and treatment statement, a written confirmation, a written confirmation of medical treatment, a appearance request for appearance by a witness, a certificate of distribution of mail, a criminal investigation report (F director's telephone statement hearing report);

1. Application of investigation reports (Submission of Suspect Data), investigation reports (verification of suspect A medical treatment procedures), and statutes;

1. Article 12 (1) of the Act on Testimony, Appraisal, etc. before the National Assembly which selects the relevant criminal facts, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Judgment on the assertion by the defendant and his defense counsel under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act

1. Around August 2018, the Defendant: (a) on the left side, the Defendant was diagnosed by ambafy; and (b) on October 19, 2018, on the day when he was summoned as a witness of the inspection of the state administration as a ambafy; (c) on the day when he was summoned as a witness of the inspection of the state administration, he was scheduled to provide dental treatment; and (d) on this reason, the Defendant submitted a written statement of non-appearance to the Chairman of the National Assembly Education Committee according to the instruction of the officer in charge of the National Assembly Education Committee; (c) in accordance with the instruction of the officer in charge, supplemented the written reasons for non-appearance; and (d) submitted again along with the supporting documents; and (d) it was understood that the officer in charge