2. Determination

A. It is recognized that the Defendant, who led to the instant crime, led to the confession and reflect of the instant crime, and the amount of damage is not so significant, and that the Defendant fully repaid and agreed to the victims.

B. However, in full view of the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant had approximately 40 criminal records of the same kind of crime; (b) the Defendant had been sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for the same kind of criminal record and repeated crimes of the same kind in 5 days after release; and (c) the Defendant’s age, details of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, etc., which are favorable to the Defendant, even if considering the favorable circumstances of the Defendant as seen earlier, the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable.

C. Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.