However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On October 27, 2019, at around 02:15, the Defendant: (a) reported 112 that “the male sexual rupe hacker hacker hacks and hacks other customers in front of the Incheon Dong-gu B hotel; and (b) sent out to the place and listened to the details of the report; and (c) hacks the face to the hacker D (ma, 31 years old) belonging to the Incheon Seo-gu Police Station C District in the Incheon Seo-gu Police Station C District, and hacks the face to the hacker of the victim, “I am hack hick, hick hick, and hack one hack hick hick, hick hick, and hacks the victim’s face, and hack the victim’s face, hack the victim’s face to drinking.

As a result, the defendant assaulted police officers to interfere with legitimate execution of duties by police officers' 112 reports and crime prevention, and at the same time, the victim was injured by the victim, such as the victim's loss of the victim who needs to be treated for about three weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report on investigation (Submission of a medical certificate for a victim);

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The defendant's reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act include two times of violence, which prevents the execution of police officers' duties and causes injury to the defendant.

However, the sentencing conditions indicated in the records of this case, such as the defendant's age, character and conduct, family relationship, home environment, motive and means of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, shall be determined as ordered in consideration of the fact that the defendant recognized the crime, and there is no criminal conviction exceeding the fine, and other circumstances that constitute the sentencing conditions indicated in the records.