2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. Status 1 of the parties to the case

The Corporation (hereinafter referred to as the “Corporation”) shall be called the Corporation in the instant case, from the Corporation C, for the extension of the ground factory in Gyeongbuk-gun D.

(2) The Plaintiff is a person who engages in wholesale business and removal business, such as scrap iron, with the trade name “F” in Daegu-gu E.

3) As of November 3, 2010, the Defendant registered the business as F’s business owner, but closed the said business on February 22, 201, and registered the F’s business as F’s business owner on April 11, 2011, and subsequently closed the said business on February 11, 2014. (B) In order for the Nonparty Company to perform the instant construction work, the Defendant was a person who again closed the said business. (B) In the event of G’s accident, the Nonparty Company removed two existing buildings, the steel structure of which was steel structure, and on November 18, 2010, the Nonparty Company requested the Plaintiff to remove the Dong building (hereinafter “instant Dong building”).

2) For the removal of the building B of this case, steel cutting is necessary, and the plaintiff requested the non-party G, who is entitled to the steel cutting, to remove the building B of this case. On November 18, 2010, the head of the non-party company requested the removal of the building B of this case to the plaintiff through the Head of the Working Group I, and the head of the non-party company proposed that the non-party company would make a scrap metal from the time of the removal of the building of this case, instead of paying a separate cost for the removal of the building of this case, the plaintiff would remove the building of this case after visiting the construction of this case on the same day and verifying the number of scrap metal that may occur during the structure and removal of the building of this case. On the other hand, the plaintiff visited the non-party G, who is entitled to the steel cutting, and requested the non-party G, who is entitled to the removal of the building of this case to remove the building of this case, around 10, 2010.