However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date of the final judgment.

On September 25, 2015, at around 04:22, the Defendant returned home from E by a police officer who belongs to a police station of Seongbuk-gu Police Station of Sungnam-gu, who was drunkly under the influence of alcohol at a convenience store B located in Sungnam-gu, Sungnam-si.

Along with the audience, the chest of the above police officer was sealed by his hand, and was expressed as “Chewing gue, no fee, or no fee,” and the part on the part of the above police officer was sent once to drinking.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers on the maintenance of public peace and order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement of E;

1. A written statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the investigation report (dynamic image analysis report);

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (In light of the fact that the criminal defendant is against his/her gender and that he/she has no record of punishment or heavier than the fine);

1. Social service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;