beta
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2016.03.24 2014고단1675

부정수표단속법위반

Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant, as the representative director of C, entered into a check contract at the same place as Sung-dong branch of the National Bank, and traded over the check.

On November 2010, the Defendant issued one check number “F”, “400,000,000” and “one check per bank held in the name of the Defendant as of April 2, 2011” at the E hotel coffee shop located in Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

However, on April 4, 201, when the bill holder G presented the above check at a point below the upper salary of the National Bank, the payment period during which G was presented, but the check was not paid as a reason for the suspension of transaction.

2. Determination

(a) Collection of checks after prosecution: February 17, 2016; dismissal of public prosecution: Article 2(4) of the Control of Illegal Check Act; Article 327 Subparag. 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act