beta
(영문) 대구지방법원 2017.05.25 2017고단734

성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)

Text

Defendant

A In 8 months of imprisonment, Defendant B is punished by a fine of 5,00,000 won, Defendant C is punished by a fine of 3,00,000 won, and Defendant D.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A and Defendant B’s joint crime committed on February 1, 2016 operated a trade name in Daegu Dong-gu P from around February 1, 2016, and Defendant B served as an employee at the said commercial sex dealing business establishment, providing male customers with information by studio, and delivering them to Defendant A, a business owner, receiving the price of commercial sex acts from customers.

On February 14, 2016, the Defendants received 110,000 won as the price for the sexual traffic from Q (the same day of suspension of indictment) who is the customer at the above sexual traffic business establishment around 22:30 on February 14, 2016, and let female employees (R) do the similar acts, as well as from February 1, 2016 to February 15, 2016, the Defendants received 80,000 won or 110,000 won as the price for the sexual traffic from the unspecified number of male customers at the above sexual traffic business establishment and caused female employees to do the similar acts or sexual intercourse.

As a result, Defendants conspired to act as a broker for commercial sex acts.

2. From May 21, 2016, Defendant A and Defendant C operated a sexual traffic business establishment with the trade name “T” located in Daegu Northern-gu S, Daegu-gu. Defendant C was in charge of guiding male customers by studio and delivering them to Defendant A, an employer, by receiving the price of sexual traffic from customers.

From May 21, 2016 to May 23, 2016, the Defendants received 110,000 won as the price for sexual intercourse from the unfash male customers, and let H, an unfash employee of the unfash (U), do sexual intercourse at the said sexual traffic business establishment, and had H, a female employee, receive 110,000 won or 130,000 won as the price for sexual intercourse from the said sexual traffic business establishment to May 23, 2016.

As a result, Defendants conspired to act as a broker for commercial sex acts.

3. Defendant D.