When receiving hospitalized treatment, the Defendant knew that insurance money, such as major adult disease hospitalization expenses and hospitalization allowances, is to be paid according to each of the above insurance, and knew that there is no need for hospitalized treatment, or that only short-term hospitalized treatment requires hospital treatment, and received repeated hospitalized treatment and received the insurance money based on the confirmation document for entrance and discharge.

Accordingly, the Defendant was hospitalized for 20 days from July 7, 2008 to July 26, 2008 on the ground of dependence urology therapy, etc. at D hospitals located in Gwangju Northern-gu, Gwangju, but at the time, at the time, the Defendant was provided medical treatment for drugs, such as blood transfusion and he was provided for climatic surgery, and there was no need to undergo hospital treatment.

Nevertheless, on July 28, 2008, the Defendant claimed insurance money for the victim’s teaching life, mermeras’s life, and Korean-style life on the ground of the above hospitalized treatment. On July 29, 2008, the Defendant received insurance money of KRW 1,600,000 from the victim’s teaching life, KRW 1,200,000 from the victim’s Matas, KRW 832,00 from the victim’s Chinese-style life, and received KRW 3,632,00 in total from the victim’s Chinese-style life, and received KRW 3,632,00 in total from the victims. From that time to May 31, 2014, the Defendant acquired the insurance money of KRW 120,487,492 from the victims.

2. Determination

A. First, among the evidence submitted by the Prosecutor, the reply to the request for review, such as the adequacy of hospitalization in the preparation of the Health Insurance Review Institute, among the evidence submitted by the Prosecutor, is the opinion of the doctor who is a member of the Health Insurance Review Board, and is the statement of the author or person who has made a statement in accordance with Article