beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 2020.08.27 2020나60338

대여금

Text

1. The application for intervention in the instant co-litigation shall be dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit resulting from the intervention in the co-litigation shall be.

Reasons

Intervention in co-litigation pursuant to Article 83(1) of the Civil Procedure Act shall be permitted to a third party only in cases where the purpose of the lawsuit between the other party and the third party is determined jointly and severally against either party and the third party, i.e., the judgment on the lawsuit between the other party,

However, there is no ground to view that the judgment on the loan case of this court 2020Na39, where the plaintiff co-litigants filed an application for intervention in the co-litigation, has an effect on the plaintiff co-litigation intervenor.

Therefore, the application for intervention in the instant co-litigation is inappropriate and its defects cannot be corrected because it fails to meet the requirements for intervention. Therefore, it is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench without pleading pursuant to Article 219 of the Civil Procedure Act.