사해행위취소
1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.
Purport of claim and appeal
1..
The reasoning of this court’s reasoning for accepting the judgment of the court of first instance is as stated in the corresponding part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for adding “Sagu District Court” after the third 10th of the judgment of the court of first instance, which reduces “Sagu District Court” after the third 10th of the judgment of the court of first instance, thereby citing this in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
ARTICLE 2-2
part below paragraph (1)
B. 1) In light of the facts acknowledged by the first instance judgment cited prior to the existence of the secured claim, and the fact that the first instance judgment cited prior to the existence of the secured claim, and that the second instance court passed five years without raising an objection or filing a lawsuit of objection against the payment order by Daegu District Court 2010 tea10762, the defendant whether the instant building constitutes a fraudulent act constitutes the Plaintiff’s claim against E and H constitutes a secured claim against the obligee’s right of revocation) or not, the Defendant constructed the instant building in which the J company, the recipient of the construction contract of the instant building, constructed the instant building with his own effort and materials, and the E did not pay the construction price in full, and the registration of preservation of ownership was applied for compulsory sale of the instant building, and therefore, the instant building does not fall under the property of the subcontractor, which the J company acquired the instant building in its original condition, and therefore, it appears that it would belong to the contractor’s property under the name of the contractor and the subcontractor, even if the contractor agreed to vest in the construction permit and its property 290.