When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The Defendant and B, around 19:45 on September 8, 2016, performed drinking at the main point of “E” for the victim D’s operation in Ulsan Jung-gu, U.S., U.S., and the Defendant and B, on the ground that B’s drinking and drinking pursuant to the following table customer’s talks with each other, the Defendant: (a) the Defendant and the Defendant expressed a bath to each of the influent customers on the name fluent table; (b) the Defendant talked to the name fluent customers in the name fluence; (c) the Defendant fluence flusium, “the flusium, flusium,” and (d) the flusing victim’s abusive, and (c) the Defendant and B, together with the flusing the victim, interfered with the victim’s main duties by force by avoiding the disturbance for about 30 minutes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The suspect interrogation protocol of the police as to B;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the draft D;

1. Articles 314 (1) and 30 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes;

1. The fact that there are several times of past records under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act with the detention in the workhouse is disadvantageous to the defendant, or the fact that there is an agreement with the victim, or other favorable circumstances such as the scale of damage, circumstances leading to the crime, and attitude of reflectivity, etc. as stated in the records and arguments, shall be determined like the order; and