beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2019.08.29 2017가합521367

임금

Text

1. The defendant has the respective money stated in the "total" column in the "amount of tolerance" in the attached Table 2 for each plaintiff to the plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. 1) On September 7, 2012, the Defendant is a company with the objective of security business, alarm system service, etc. (hereinafter referred to as “U.S. Armed Forces” as the parties agree with convenience.

) A security service contract (hereinafter referred to as “instant security service contract”) and

(2) From November 8, 2012 to January 7, 2016, the Plaintiffs, as stated in attached Table 1, including Plaintiffs E and F, worked as the head of office, and the Plaintiffs, as the head of office, provided security services to the U.S. unit from November 8, 2012 to January 7, 2016, and provided security services to the U.S. unit. (2) From November 8, 2012 to January 7, 2016, the Plaintiffs provided security services to the U.S. unit in the U.S. unit located in Yongsan-gu, Dongbcheon-si, and Busan. (3) From the U.S. unit located in Yongsan-gu, Dongcheon-si, and Busan, Seoul. (40 to 43, 46, 47, 98 to 102, and 104 to 115, including Plaintiff G and C, and the Plaintiffs were working as the head of office of general security guard.

B. On September 27, 2012, immediately after the conclusion of the instant security service contract between the Plaintiffs and the Defendant, the Defendant signed the employment support document and submitted it to the USFK on September 27, 2012. On October 2012, 2012, the said written employment contract (hereinafter “the first employment contract”) with the following content from the persons who prepared the employment support document in the form of a written contract including the employee’s signature.

In addition, in the course of the preparation of the first employment contract, a salary table for each class prepared by the defendant (hereinafter referred to as the “first salary table”).

A. It is also presented to the plaintiffs.