beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.10.19 2016고단2996

성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(업무상위력등에의한추행)

Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. The Defendant is a person who was working as a manager at D E hotel located in Suwon-gu, Suwon-si, from August 2015 to January 30, 2016, and the victim F (n, 24 years of age) was working as an employee of the said hotel F from August 7, 2015 to January 30, 2016.

A. On August 7, 2015, the Defendant: (a) stated that he was an employee who was newly enrolled in the Defendant before the above hotel cover on an irregular or irregular basis on August 7, 2015; and (b) stated that he was the same sex as the Defendant’s “Is?”

"I am rhym the right side of the victim with the hand floor of the victim's own defendant."

Accordingly, the Defendant committed an indecent act by force on the part of the injured party who is under his protection and supervision due to his duties, employment or other relations.

B. On August 9, 2015, the Defendant, at around 18:00 to 19:00 on August 9, 2015, using the gaps in front of the victim’s hotel liftss, leaving the victim as deductible expenses.

At the same time, the victim's loss was brought up with the victim's loss with the victim's loss, and the victim's loss was brought up by the victim's own loss.

Accordingly, the Defendant committed an indecent act by force on the part of the injured party who is under his protection and supervision due to his duties, employment or other relations.

(c)

On October 17, 2015, the Defendant, at around 17:00 on October 10, 2015, using the creshs in front of the victim in front of the above hotel so that the Defendant can cut off the Masc fact to the victim and do so.

The second part of the victim's knife had the right side of the victim's knife two times.

Accordingly, the Defendant committed an indecent act by force on the part of the injured party who is under his protection and supervision due to his duties, employment or other relations.

2. The Defendant’s summary of the Defendant’s defense does not have to rhym the right side of F on one occasion, and there was no fact that F was knife and several times with F’s consent, and there was no fact that F had the right side of F on two occasions, and thus, the Defendant forced F to commit an indecent act as described in the facts charged.