When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The defendant is a person who drives a motor vehicle B as a duty.

On December 28, 2014, the Defendant driven the above vehicle around 20:25 on December 28, 2014, and operated a two-lane road in front of Li-si 21, Li-si 21, Li-si, in the direction of Li-si University, one lane in the direction of the apartment house.

Since this is the front road of a commercial building, the driver has a duty of care to live well on the front side and the left side, and to accurately operate the steering direction and the brake system.

Nevertheless, it was shocked by the victim C (at the age of 50 per party), who was parked on the right-hand side of the vehicle of the victim C (at the age of 50 per party), with the top gate and the top gate of the vehicle of the victim, and the top gate of the front wheel.

In the end, due to occupational negligence, the injured party damaged the non-repair of the repair cost, such as the driver, and the damaged vehicle obstructed the intersection by blocking the cross-road by the shock, thereby causing a general traffic obstacle.

In the end, a witness E (the remaining, the age of 25) who had been a witness to escape without any action at the site showed that the witness E (the age of 25) had a about 100 meters with a 10-meter with a stoba, thereby leading to traffic danger or hindrance, and escaped without taking necessary measures.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Application of the statutes governing de facto survey reports and field photographs;

1. Article 148 and Article 54 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;