When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

The defendant is a person who operates a restaurant with D located in Nam-gu, Nam-gu, Seoul, and a food entertainment business operator shall not provide alcoholic beverages to juveniles, and when alcoholic beverages are supplied, he/she shall check the age.

Nevertheless, at around 00:30 on July 9, 2016, the Defendant sold alcoholic beverages, such as being deemed to be a clerical error in the category of “Padju 3 C, C, and C, 3 C,” written in the indictment of 1 C, and “D,” among “D” restaurants, the Defendant sold alcoholic beverages, such as being deemed to be a clerical error in the category of “P, C, and C, 1 C,” written in the indictment of 1 C.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness E and F;

1. Reporting on the arrest of a case;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Article 58 Subparag. 3 of the Juvenile Protection Act as stated in the pertinent legal provisions on criminal facts and Article 59 Subparag. 6 of the Act on the Selection of the Punishment of Youth, which are stated in the indictment, shall be deemed to be a clerical error in the “Article 59 Subparag. 6 of the Juvenile Protection Act”, and Article 28(1) of the Act as well as the selection of fines.

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;

1. Article 186 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act bearing Costs of Trial;