However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On July 10, 2018, at around 04:13, the Defendant: (a) asked the Defendant “C” on the top of the hotel located in Busan Shipping Daegu, and called “C” (hereinafter “C”); and (b) the Defendant assaulted the Defendant, “Is the Defendant,” “Is the Plaintiff, she takes a look at, and she takes a look at, the son who was called “C” in front of the hotel located in Busan Shipping Daegu, and was called “C,” and “Is the Defendant,” and the Defendant was able to commit an assault, such as “Is the Plaintiff, shes the Plaintiff, who was called on the road, and she takes a walk at the seat of the D District F, who was called on his hand upon receiving a request for support.”

Cper assaulted the above F's chest to the floor by hand, and obstructed the police officer's legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to E and F;

1. Investigation report (to attach photographs by field photographing CDs and capturings);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of Chapter 1 of video recording CDs;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution [Scope of Recommendation] The basic area (from June to one year and six months) (the person subject to special sentencing) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution No. 1 (the scope of recommendation] does not interfere with the performance of official duties. [Judgment of sentencing] The degree of damage, the degree of the same kind of punishment, and the records of having been punished for the same kind of crime, and all of the sentencing conditions against the defendant as ordered.