2.Provided, That the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive;

On April 27, 2009, without authority, the Defendant: (a) around Busan, without authority for the purpose of exercising; (b) on the date of the last endorser column of the Promissory Notes No. 26,800,000 won at the face value of the issuance of the (State) B representative C; (c) on April 27, 2009, the date of issuance D; and (d) August 25, 2009, on the date of the last endorser column of the Promissory Notes No. 1, which was dated August 27, 2009, stated “E” and “E” and “F” in the address column; and (d) forged endorsement, which is a description of the rights and obligations of the said Promissory Notes, which is the entry of the Defendant’s seal affixed on the name and duties of the F; and (e) exercised securities by delivering the said Promissory Notes under the name of 16,307,500 won to H on the same day.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each protocol of suspect examination of the accused;

1. The statement of H;

1. Application of statutes on copies of promissory notes;

1. Articles 214 (2) and 217 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Suspension of execution under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., the fact that the receiver of a promissory note subject to criminal administration withdraws the complaint and the defendant acknowledges mistake);