When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The defendant and B are articles that operate high-sea taxi, and the victim C is an article that operates Seoul taxi.

On August 10, 2016, around 05:00, the Defendant and B: (a) stated that the taxi platform in front of Mangsan-dong, U.S., to move customers who intend to go to Seoul to a destination is illegal business in other jurisdiction; and (b) Defendant B set up a taxi operated in front of the victim’s vehicle, and Defendant A stopped the taxi in front of the victim’s vehicle.

As a result, the defendant and B interfered with the victim's taxi business by force, such as prohibiting the victim's vehicle from moving for about 15 minutes.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the examination of partially the police officers of the accused;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect B of the police;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs (fields);

1. Article 314 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Articles 314(1) and 310 of the Criminal Act, and the selection of fines for the crime;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;