업무방해등
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. On February 29, 2012, the Defendant found the Defendant guilty of the charges of assaulting a victim even though he/she did not have any physical contact with the victim on February 29, 2012, the lower court erred by misapprehending the facts and adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment.
2. The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below. The victim stated in the court below that "the mother and the child's head had been received with his hair part, and spawn and continued to spawn him," and that "the defendant and the victim got spawn at the time" at the police station stated that "the defendant and the victim got spawn's body, and the defendant got spawn's body," and that the plaintiff's witness at the time stated in the police station that "the defendant and the victim got spawn's body, and the defendant got spawn's body," (No. 96 pages of the evidence record) and the plaintiff's spawn's work at the border point located in the first floor of the building where the defendant puts a swn't put the defendant and the victim into a big dispute, and there was no physical contact between the defendant and the victim at the time of the court below's decision, and there is no possibility of dispute between the defendant and the victim's body.
3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.