물품대금
1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the defendant 5,070,00 won against the plaintiff A, 6,996,000 won against the plaintiff B, and 27,95 against the plaintiff C.
1. The reasoning of this court’s judgment citing the judgment of the court of first instance is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for dismissal or addition as follows, and thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure
2. The fourth Ra of the judgment of the court of first instance, which is either written or added.
The paragraphs are as follows:
(d) On July 13, 2017, Daejeon District Court sentenced I to the punishment of imprisonment for three years and six months (Seoul District Court Decision 2016Da25777 decided 2017 decided November 9, 2017; 1.3rd 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 96th 197, "the defendant's order was forged; 18th 9th 9th 7th 9th 16th 16th 7th 197, "the defendant's order was forged; 2th 9th 9th 7th 197th 16th 196th 7th 197," "the defendant's order was forged; 3th 5th 9th 1st 196th 197th 20 7th 197th 2018)."
The “instant computer” of the first instance judgment Nos. 6, 9, 8, 2, and 10 of the first instance judgment is “the instant computer” and “the instant computer” of the sixth, 12, and 13 of the sixth, respectively.