1. On February 4, 2013, from around 20:00 to 21:00 on the same day, the Defendant intruded the victim E, who was kept in custody, over the fence, into D Co., Ltd., a company located in the Republic of Korea from around 20:0 to around 21:00 on the same day, and stolen it with approximately KRW 2,167,100 at the market price of the victim E, which was owned by the victim.

2. On April 1, 2013, from around 20:00 to around 23:50 of the same day, the Defendant intruded into G located in F at the time of harmony with the victim H, and then stolen the damaged goods at a price equivalent to approximately KRW 1,140,50, the market price of the victim H, which was kept in custody, approximately KRW 150 km, approximately KRW 154 km, the market price of KRW 1,047,00, and approximately KRW 118 km, the market price of KRW 141,00,000, and approximately KRW 16 km, the market price of KRW 91,00,00, and approximately KRW 26 km,346,100, and the market price of KRW 16,00,00.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Examination protocol of the accused by prosecution;

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol against the accused and I;

1. The police statement of H;

1. A written statement prepared in H and E;

1. Police seizure records;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the investigation report (specific as a suspect), CCTV image data, field map, driver's license picture map, video photographing map, license ledger, borrowed inquiry, purchase account book and business registration certificate, J CCTV image data, remittance records, investigation report (J-A), investigation report (in the case of a suspect), investigation report (in the case of a suspect's failure to attend the investigation), investigation report (in the case of a suspect's failure to attend the investigation), data related to the departure from the K agency driving (in the case of a suspect's failure to attend the investigation), reports on occurrence (thief), collection photographs, internal investigation reports (in the case of a suspect's CCTV image analysis), investigation report (in the case of a suspect's telephone statement related to a M address), investigation report (in the case of a victim'

1. Article 330 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting the crime;

1. Determination as to the defendant's assertion among concurrent crimes as to the former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act

1. The Defendant alleged that he was not at the time and place specified in paragraph (1) of the facts charged, and stolen the victim E’s property.